The first of 3 preliminary sketches for the assignment. I used the working blind drawing method and then two further drawn lines over this. Plus some overworking in areas of the face. I particularly like the activity or energy of the drawing and the way the face has emerged from the different lines and overworking.
Could definitely have worked much slower on the blind drawing stage to establish a stronger layout for the fiture.
Second drawing using water soluble wax crayons – again I worked in various layers overworking each colour and then used water to blur/fuse them together. Is using water drawing? I don’t know. This drawing also has a freshness about it but looses out a bit on the accuracy side.
Final study and dealing with the difficulty of using purely line to create volume in the figure. Cheated using various inks as well as the main drawing with ink and pen. Again do like the spontaneity of this image but am becoming aware of the difficulty of working these type of methods up to A1 size. The 3 studies are around A3.
This is the A1 final version of the drawing. Realised how much line work it takes to build up the volume – i.e. the jumper which I think is successful The trousers are less so. Wanted to use another version of line but but short on time. Some inaccuracies of proportion and placing of the limbs – particular the far – left leg. Also head not properly placed – neck too long……
He is so nearly there but minor inaccuracies escalate when working at a larger size. Working purely with line was challenging I found.
Second week of long pose drawing. I knew that the position I was in would not produce a good drawing of Tom’s head as it was too much in profile.
Firstly tried a more straight on view:-
The first sketches where I was trying to get the proportions of his head and face. He has a very long face with small mouth and chin. Realised that this is perhaps not the best angle and so moved to the side and back of the class. I was struggling to see the detail of his face and its tones from the distance I was from the model. But decided to stick with this angle as it was the best that I could find under the circumstances in the room.
This was the first phase of the drawing which was entirely with water soluble crayons on pastel paper. Had applied a small amount of water but in fact it tended to make it messy and obliterated the marks of the crayons which I found most pleasing.
I had wanted to be more experimental but in a classroom situation with limited time I had to make decisions which drew me back to the crayons.
Final drawing after 2 hours. Some parts of which I really like especially the mood of pensiveness. I am sorry that this particular angle or any angle with this pose did not allow me to capture his eyes. Nostril facing too large will have to take it down and it may help the overall structure. Looking back at his photo the face is too long but I think that the elongation has added to its expression in some ways.
The completion of the drawing to this stage has brought up more questions than answering the remit of the assignment.
In this first study I was using water soluble crayons on wet 300gm paper. I like the way the colours and tones move together.
Tried something similar with water soluble pencils in this next study. Somethings about this I like – the shapes and dynamic proportions of the composition leading towards the top right corner.
Just a trickle of graphite powder – can be very expressive but blurs – some how I would like to find a way to capture the liveliness of these drawn lines – except that this study is supposed to be about tone.
Decided to work on the wet on wet with the soluble crayons on 300gms watercolour paper. Time is a real factor when you upscale on size. I am just getting used to this. This definitely took more than 3 hours to the final piece below.
I like how the big masses of colour work as well as the tonal variants of the t-shirt and trousers. Along the way it has lost something of the dynamism of the original composition as well as the reclining attitude – but it did take a long time. For the first time I am please ow shape is implied by the colours without having to be explicit with lines.
I am not sure that I have particular research for this Assignment but more as the background for the whole Part 4 which has been an on-going exploration. After the last Assignment my tutor suggested I look at the work of various artists some of which I have followed up. These include Otto Dix, John Currin, Ron Muerk, Hope Gangloff, Tracy Emin, Sam Taylor-Wood, Ana Mendieta – the suggestion was to look at them in order to become more fluid in my approach to drawing.
As you will see from my sketchbook I looked at these and a number of others, Egon Schiele, Frank Auerbach, Piete Peere, and Degas.
I am aware that I have looked at more artists whilst working through Part 4 than I have in the previous parts and am feeling rather overwhelmed by the variety and diversity of the skills.
This has been a really rewarding section of the Module. I have always loved the figure and am even more enthusiastic about it as an artistic subject but:-
- There has been so much to take on board in a relatively short space of time. I have progressed in my drawing abilities and am certainly looking more carefully. But it is transient sometimes it “works” and sometimes it doesn’t. I know this is a lapse in concentration on my part hence the challenge of this assignment because of the size of the work and the length of time necessary to work on an individual piece. I don’t think I have ever done this before (except in the other assignment pieces).
- In some cases I have been limited by the poses taking place in life classes, the seated pose and the head. This has meant that I have not been able to dictate the angles, lighting etc. Tried with the composition of the seated pose I looked at finding a more dynamic closer view but this did not work. Similarly with the head I was quite far away in the class. This is not to excuse my work but part of my realisation on how much I need to be able to dictate.
- Some of the styles I wanted to try did not lend themselves to the particular settings. I like my studies for the seated figure far more than the final piece. I could not however work out how I could combine these and keep within the “lines” literally of the brief.
- I continue to be challenged by working on a larger scale using some of the materials and methods I have tried during this part. Scaling up needs a scaling up of the marks too in order to create greater impact. I am not yet sure how to do this.
- Still there is a tendency to go back to tired (maybe tired by tried) and tested methods of working although discovering working on the wet heavier paper was successful for the reclining figure. Interesting footnote to this is that I wanted to take this further in a long pose class recently but it didn’t work because I did not take enough time to choose the compositional angle and there was too much literally bare flesh to deal with tonally.
- I have slowed down somewhat but not enough to be able to be consistent in what I am producing. I am split in this in that ideas come fleetingly and want to be followed whereas drawing is a skill that will need 10,000 or is it 100,000 hours!